Case LawHigh Court › Nma/1299/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/1299/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-10 Mumbai v. Hindustan Composites Ltd

High Court 07 May 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1299/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-10 Mumbai v. Hindustan Composites Ltd
Date of order
07 May 2009
Assessment year(s)
1995-96
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Nma/1299/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-10 Mumbai v. Hindustan Composites Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: No positive statement is being made on behalf of the revenue as to whether appeal is filed against the order of the tribunal for assessment year 1995-96.

Decision: The appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

AGK IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1299 Of 2009 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.307 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income- Tax - 10, Mumbai ..Applicant. V/s. Hindustan Composites Limited ..Respondent. Mr.J.S. Saluja for the applicant. Mr.Jitendra Jain with Mr.H.K. Sudhakara i/by M/s.Khaitan & Co. for the respondent. CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 7TH MAY, 2009. P.C. : 1. Heard. By consent of parties, the delay caused in filing the appeal is condoned. 2. By consent of both the parties, the appeal is taken up for hearing. 3. The tribunal has relied on the judgment of this Court in the case of C.I.T. V/s. Bhor Industries Limited reported in 264 ITR 180. The said judgment is still holding the field. Apart from this in the assessment year 1995-96, identical finding was recorded by the tribunal in favour of the assessee, relying upon the same judgment. No positive statement is being made on behalf of the revenue as to whether appeal is filed against the order of the tribunal for assessment year 1995-96. 4. In this view of the matter, we see no substantial question of law in this appeal. The appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (V.C. Daga, J.) (J.P. Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan