Nma/1313/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Tax-(Tds) v. M/S. Seiko Plast
High Court
27 Nov 2006 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1313/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Tax-(Tds) v. M/S. Seiko Plast
Date of order
27 Nov 2006
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/1313/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Tax-(Tds) v. M/S. Seiko Plast, the High Court (2006) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.1313 OF 2006IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD.) NO.700 OF 2006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1313 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD.) NO.700 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income tax(TDS) ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Seika Plast ..Respondent.
Mr.A.D. Kango for appellant.
None for respondent.
CORAM : H.L.GOKHALE AND
CORAM : H.L.GOKHALE AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 27TH NOVEMBER, 2006.
DATED : 27TH NOVEMBER, 2006.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
Heard Mr.Kango for the appellant. None for
the respondent. Motion seeks condonation of delay of
72 days. The supporting affidavit has been filed and
various reasons have been given or the delay in filing
the appeal. We accept the explanation. Motion is
granted. Delay is condoned. Appeal be numbered.
(H.L.GOKHALE, J.)
(H.L.GOKHALE, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue