Nma/132/2018 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-(E) Pune v. Maharashtra Academy Of Engineering And Educational Research
High Court
01 Mar 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/132/2018 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-(E) Pune v. Maharashtra Academy Of Engineering And Educational Research
Date of order
01 Mar 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Nma/132/2018 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-(E) Pune v. Maharashtra Academy Of Engineering And Educational Research, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
* 1/2 * NMA-132-2018 (SR.24)
Thursday, 1.3.2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 132 OF 2018
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO. 2990 OF 2017
Commissioner of Income Tax-(Exemption), Pune ….AppellantV/s.Maharashtra Academy of Engineering and Educational Research….Respondent
* * * * *
Mr. Sham Walve, Advocate for the applicant, original appellant.
Mr. Tanzil Padvekar, Advocate for the respondent.
CORAM :- M.S. SANKLECHA, &
SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.
DATE :-1ST MARCH, 2018.
P.C. :-
1. This Notice of Motion has been taken out
seeking condonation of 6 days delay in filing the
Rane
* 2/2 *
accompanying Appeal from the order dated 23[rd] May, 2017 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.
2. We have perused the Affidavit-in-support of the
Notice of Motion dated 27[th] November, 2017 of Ms. Sudha Gupta, Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax and are
satisfied with the reasons mentioned therein. Accordingly, the Notice of Motion is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
3. Needless to state that, the office objections, if any, will be removed within a period of 4 weeks from today failing which the Appeal would be dismissed without further reference to the Court.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.