Nma/133/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-13, Mumbai v. Nihar Equipment Pvt. Ltd
High Court
01 Mar 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/133/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-13, Mumbai v. Nihar Equipment Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
01 Mar 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Nma/133/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-13, Mumbai v. Nihar Equipment Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Rane
* 1/2 * NMA-121-2018 (SR.5)NMA-133-2018 (SR.25)
Thursday, 1.3.2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 133 OF 2018
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO. 2719 OF 2017
ALONGWITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 121 OF 2018
ININCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO. 2721 OF 2017
Pr. Commissioner of IncomeTax-13, Mumbai ….AppellantV/s.Nihar Equipment Pvt. Ltd….Respondent
* * * * *
Mr. Akkhileshwar Sharma, Advocate for the applicant, original appellant.
CORAM :- M.S. SANKLECHA, &
SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.
DATE :-
1ST MARCH, 2018.
P.C. :-
1. None appears for the respondent, despite
service.
2. These two Notices of Motion have been taken
Rane* 2/2 * NMA-121-2018 (SR.5)NMA-133-2018 (SR.25)Thursday, 1.3.2018
out seeking condonation of delay of one day caused in filing the accompanying Appeals from the common order
dated 29[th] March, 2017 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in respect of Assessment Years 2007-08 and 2008-09.
2. We have perused the Affidavit dated 12[th ]
December, 2017 of Ms. Anuradha S, Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax and are satisfied with the reasons mentioned therein for the delay in filing the
Appeals. Accordingly, both the Notices of Motion are allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
3. Needless to state that, the office objections, if any, will be removed within a period of 4 weeks from today failing which the Appeal would be dismissed without further reference to the Court.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.