Case LawHigh Court › Nma/1344/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/1344/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 26, Mumbai v. Mrs. Gita C. Salgaonkar

High Court 28 Apr 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1344/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 26, Mumbai v. Mrs. Gita C. Salgaonkar
Date of order
28 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Nma/1344/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 26, Mumbai v. Mrs. Gita C. Salgaonkar, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.1344 OF 2008inINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.640 OF 2002inINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.OF 2008The Commissioner of IncomeTax 26, Mumbai..Appellant Mrs gita C.Salgaonkar.. Respondent Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for AppellantMr.P.N.Naik for Respondent P.C. CORAM : Dr.S.Radhakrishnan andA.V.Nirgude, JJDATED : 28th April, 2008 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Bythis notice of motion, the appellant is seekingcondonation of 120 days delay caused infiling theappeal. For the reasons stated in the affidavitin support of the notice of motion, sufficientcause is made out for condonation of delay andthere is no case of inaction, negligence or wantof bonafide on the part of the appellant. Hence,the notice of motion is made absolute in terms ofprayer clause (a). Learned counsel for theappellant undertakes to furnish copy of memo ofappeal along with its annexures within two weeksfrom today. 2. Place the appeal on board for admission in themonth of September, 2008 subject to numbering. (A.V.Nirgude, J) (Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan