Nma/1367/2017 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. Forbes And Company Ltd
High Court
07 Nov 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1367/2017 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. Forbes And Company Ltd
Date of order
07 Nov 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/1367/2017 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. Forbes And Company Ltd, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1
ssp
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1367 OF 2017 ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.945 OF 2017
Office Notes, Office Memorandam of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s ordersor directions and Registrar’s orders
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Applicant
Mr.Balasaheb S. Yevale for the Respondent.
CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
A.K.MENON,JJ.
DATE : NOVEMBER 7, 2017
P.C.
1Heard the learned counsel appearing for the applicant and the learned counsel for the respondent. In view of the averments made in the Notice of Motion, sufficient cause is made out to
condone the delay of 3 days.
Accordingly, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
(A.K.MENON,J.)
(A.S.OKA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue