Case LawHigh Court › Nma/1370/2017 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/1370/2017 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax - 2 v. Mtz Polyfilms Ltd

High Court 07 Nov 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1370/2017 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax - 2 v. Mtz Polyfilms Ltd
Date of order
07 Nov 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Nma/1370/2017 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax - 2 v. Mtz Polyfilms Ltd, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.

Decision: We direct the appellant file an affidavit of service within a period of two weeks from today.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
ssp FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1370 OF 2017 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.683 OF 2017 Office Notes, Office Memorandam of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s ordersor directions and Registrar’s orders Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Applicant None for the Respondent. CORAM : A.S.OKA, &A.K.MENON,JJ. DATE : NOVEMBER 7, 2017 P.C. 1The learned counsel appearing for the applicant states that the notice has been served to the respondent. We direct the appellant file an affidavit of service within a period of two weeks from today. 2In view of the averments made in the Notice of Motion, sufficient cause is made out to condone the delay of 11 days. Accordingly, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (A.K.MENON,J.) (A.S.OKA,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan