Case LawHigh Court › Nma/1380/2004 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Nma/1380/2004 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax City-I, Mumbai v. M/S. Hindustan Aegis Lpg Bottling Co. Ltd

High Court 09 Jul 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1380/2004 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax City-I, Mumbai v. M/S. Hindustan Aegis Lpg Bottling Co. Ltd
Date of order
09 Jul 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Nma/1380/2004 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax City-I, Mumbai v. M/S. Hindustan Aegis Lpg Bottling Co. Ltd, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1380 OF 2004 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.472 OF 2004 Commissioner of I.T., City-I, Bombay .. Appellant. V/s. M/s.Hindustan Aegis LTG Bottling Co. .. Respondent. Mr.A.S. Rao for the appellant. None for the respondent. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 9TH JULY, 2007. P.C. : 1. In support of the Notice of motion, an affidavit was filed by Mr.J.P. Jangid, Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Bombay Range 1(1). The only reason given there was restructuring of the Department for the delay of 379 days. An additional affidavit now has been filed by Mr.Pankaj Kapoor, Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Range 1(1), Mumbai. After perusing the cause shown that the Commissioner recommended filing of Appeal as far that as on 1st March, 2003 and the Appeal was filed on 29th April, 2004. Even in the second affidavit no explanation as to what happened between 1ast March, 2003 and 29th April, 2004. In absence of any 2 explanation showing cause for said delay, there are no grounds to hold that the cause shown amounts to sufficient cause. 2. In the light of that, notice of motion stands dismissed. (F.I. REBELLO, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan