Nma/1380/2004 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax City-I, Mumbai v. M/S. Hindustan Aegis Lpg Bottling Co. Ltd
High Court
09 Jul 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1380/2004 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax City-I, Mumbai v. M/S. Hindustan Aegis Lpg Bottling Co. Ltd
Date of order
09 Jul 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Nma/1380/2004 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax City-I, Mumbai v. M/S. Hindustan Aegis Lpg Bottling Co. Ltd, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1380 OF 2004
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.472 OF 2004
Commissioner of I.T., City-I, Bombay .. Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Hindustan Aegis LTG Bottling Co. .. Respondent.
Mr.A.S. Rao for the appellant.
None for the respondent.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 9TH JULY, 2007.
P.C. :
1. In support of the Notice of motion, an
affidavit was filed by Mr.J.P. Jangid, Deputy
Commissioner of Income Tax, Bombay Range 1(1). The
only reason given there was restructuring of the
Department for the delay of 379 days. An additional
affidavit now has been filed by Mr.Pankaj Kapoor,
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Range 1(1),
Mumbai. After perusing the cause shown that the
Commissioner recommended filing of Appeal as far that
as on 1st March, 2003 and the Appeal was filed on
29th April, 2004. Even in the second affidavit no
explanation as to what happened between 1ast March,
2003 and 29th April, 2004. In absence of any
2
explanation showing cause for said delay, there are
no grounds to hold that the cause shown amounts to
sufficient cause.
2. In the light of that, notice of motion stands
dismissed.
(F.I. REBELLO, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.