Nma/1394/2011 Of Ummedraj K. Vardhan v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax Mumbai
High Court
11 Jul 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1394/2011 Of Ummedraj K. Vardhan v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax Mumbai
Date of order
11 Jul 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/1394/2011 Of Ummedraj K. Vardhan v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax Mumbai, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
sas
1 nma1394-11
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1394 OF 2011IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.485 OF 2011
Ummedraj K. Vardhan
..Appellant.
V/s.
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai
..Respondent.
Mr. Jitendra Singh i/b. Sah & Sanghavi for the appellant.None for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.A.SAYED, JJ.DATED : 11TH JULY, 2011
P.C. :-
1This Notice of Motion is taken out seeking condonation of delay of 1247 days in filing the appeal. The reasons stated in the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion does not show any sufficient cause for condoning the delay. However, in the interest of justice, we condone the delay subject to the payment of cost of Rs.5,000/- to be paid by the appellant to the respondent within two weeks from today.
2.Subject to the payment of cost of Rs.5,000/- to be paid by the appellant to the respondent within 2 weeks from today, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) & (b).
3.Notice of Motion is disposed off accordingly.
(A.A. SAYED, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.