Case LawHigh Court › Nma/1410/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/1410/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-26,Mum v. Mr Joseph Bibeau

High Court 22 Oct 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1410/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-26,Mum v. Mr Joseph Bibeau
Date of order
22 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Nma/1410/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-26,Mum v. Mr Joseph Bibeau, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1410 OF 2006IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.708 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1410 OF 2006 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.708 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. Mr.Joseph Bibeau ..Respondent. Mr.P.S.Shahadevan for appellant. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 22ND OCTOBER, 2007. DATED : 22ND OCTOBER, 2007. P.C. :- P.C. :- There is a delay of 374 days in preferring the appeal. There is affidavit in support filed by S.R.Veer. The I.T.A.T. order dated 17/8/2004 was received 13/12/2004. The last date for pereferring the appeal was 11/4/2005. There is no explanation whatsoever for the delay between 13/12/2004 and 7/7/2005. 2. Thereafter, considering para 2 even the Panel constituted was in January, 2006, the appeal has been preferred only on 20th April, 2006. There is no explanation for the said period. 3. Considering the cause shown, in our opinion the same would not amount to sufficient cause. Motion is dismissed. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I.REBELL0, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan