Case LawHigh Court › Nma/143/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Nma/143/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-Iii, Mumbai v. Raju R. Shete

High Court 18 Dec 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/143/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-Iii, Mumbai v. Raju R. Shete
Date of order
18 Dec 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Nma/143/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-Iii, Mumbai v. Raju R. Shete, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION (1) NOTICE OF MOTION NO.143 OF 2007 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2462 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income Tax ) Central-III Mumbai )..Appellant V/s. Raju R.Shete (HUF) )..Respondent ---- Mr.B.M.Chatterji with Mrs.P.P.Bhosale for appellants Ms.V.B.Patel for respondents. ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 18.12.2007. PC 1. Considering the cause shown and after hearing the parties, delay condoned. Office to register the appeal. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J) : 2 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2462 OF 2006 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2462 OF 2006 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2462 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income Tax ) Central-III Mumbai )..Appellant V/s. Raju R.Shete (HUF) )..Respondent ---- Mr.B.M.Chatterji with Mrs.P.P.Bhosale for appellant Ms.V.B.Patel for respondent. ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 18.12.2007. PC 1. Revenue has preferred this appeal by contending that ITAT was not correct in relying on the judgment of this Court in the case of CIT v/s. J.K.Investors(Bombay) Ltd., reported in (2001) 168 ITR (Bombay) (Bombay) Ltd., (Bombay) Ltd., 189. Against the judgment of this Court, revenue has preferred the appeal being SLP (C) 5480 of 2001. SLP was dismissed on 1.11.2002. 2. Considering the above, the question of law as framed would not arise and consequently appeal dismissed. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan