Nma/1444/2016 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions) v. Tata Institute Of Social Science
High Court
01 Apr 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1444/2016 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions) v. Tata Institute Of Social Science
Date of order
01 Apr 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Nma/1444/2016 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions) v. Tata Institute Of Social Science, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION (L) NO. 988 OF 2016ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.348 OF 2016WITHNOTICE OF MOTION (L) NO. 994 OF 2016ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.349 OF 2016
The Commissioner of Income TaxMumbai
.. Applicant
In the matter between
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai .. Appellant
V/s.
Tata Institute of Social Science, Mumbai .. Respondent
Mr. Tejveer Singh for the appellant
Mr. Mihir Naniwadekar for the respondent
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & A.K. MENON, J.J.
DATED : 5[th] APRIL, 2016.
P.C.
1.The present Notices of Motion seek condonation of 17 days delay in filing the appeals against the order dated 16[th] September, 2015 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.
2.We have perused the affidavit-in-support of the notice of motion and are satisfied with the explanation offered for the delay in filing the appeal.
3.Accordingly, both the Notices of Motion are allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
(A.K. MENON, J.)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.