Nma/1445/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax , City 21, Mumbai v. Kantilal L. Haria (Huf)
High Court
09 Jul 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1445/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax , City 21, Mumbai v. Kantilal L. Haria (Huf)
Date of order
09 Jul 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/1445/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax , City 21, Mumbai v. Kantilal L. Haria (Huf), the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORIGINAL SIDE.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORIGINAL SIDE.
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1445 OF 2008
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LDG.) NO. 2823 OF 2007
-------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes,Office :
Memorandum of Coram, : Court’s or Judge’s orders
appearances, Court’s :
orders or directions :
Prothonotaries orders. :
------------------------------------------------------------
P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant.
None for the respondent.
CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH ANDV.C.DAGA, JJ.DATED: 9th July 2008.
CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH AND
V.C.DAGA, JJ.
DATED: 9th July 2008.
P.C.:
P.C.:
. Learned counsel for the
appellant states that respondent has been
served. Affidavit of service is filed on
record. None appears for the respondent.
2. In absence of any reply,
accepting the averments made in the
affidavit filed in support of notice of
motion on their face value, motion is
granted in terms of prayer clause (a)
2. Motion stands disposed of.
(V.C.DAGA, J.) (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.) (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.