Case LawHigh Court › Nma/1499/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/1499/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 2 Mumbai v. Shri Jugal Kishore Maheshwari

High Court 07 May 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1499/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 2 Mumbai v. Shri Jugal Kishore Maheshwari
Date of order
07 May 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Nma/1499/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 2 Mumbai v. Shri Jugal Kishore Maheshwari, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal, is therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

AGK IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1499 OF 2009 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3721 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income- Tax - 2, Mumbai ..Applicant. V/s. Jugal Kishore Maheshwari ..Respondent. Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the applicant. None for the respondent. CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 7TH MAY, 2009. P.C. : 1. For the reasons recorded in the affidavit, delay caused in filing the appeal is condoned. The notice of motion is disposed of accordingly. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the revenue fairly states that the issue sought to be raised in this appeal is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Walfort Share & Stock Brokers P Limited reported in [2009] 310 I.T.R. 421. 3. In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law arises in this appeal. The appeal, is therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs. (V.C. Daga, J.) (J.P. Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan