Case LawHigh Court › Nma/1502/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/1502/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 3, Mumbai v. M/S Chandragupta Traders (P) Ltd. ,Mumbai

High Court 09 Jul 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1502/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 3, Mumbai v. M/S Chandragupta Traders (P) Ltd. ,Mumbai
Date of order
09 Jul 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Nma/1502/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 3, Mumbai v. M/S Chandragupta Traders (P) Ltd. ,Mumbai, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORIGINAL SIDE. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL SIDE. NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1502 OF 2008 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LDG.) NO. 276 OF 2008 ------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes,Office : Memorandum of Coram, : Court’s or Judge’s orders appearances, Court’s : orders or directions : Prothonotaries orders. : ------------------------------------------------------------ Vimal Gupta with P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant. J.D.Mistry i/b. Raj Darak for the respondent. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH ANDV.C.DAGA, JJ. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH AND V.C.DAGA, JJ. DATED: 9th July 2008. DATED: 9th July 2008. P.C.: P.C.: . This notice of motion is taken out for condonation of delay. There is no reply filed by the respondent. Therefore, in absence of reply, accepting the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of notice of motion on their face value, motion deserved to be granted. 2. Even assumed that delay of each and every day has not been explained, in our opinion, considering the law laid down by the Supreme Court in relation to the exercise of powers to condone delay and also considering that this is a matter of revenue wherein public interest is involved, in our opinion, delay has to be condoned. 3. In the result, motion is granted in terms of prayer clause (a). Motion stands disposed of. (V.C.DAGA, J.) (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.) (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.) (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan