Nma/1504/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. M/S Avshesh Mercantile Ltd. , Mumbai
High Court
17 Jul 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1504/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. M/S Avshesh Mercantile Ltd. , Mumbai
Date of order
17 Jul 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/1504/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. M/S Avshesh Mercantile Ltd. , Mumbai, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O.O.C.J.
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1504 OF 2008
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.206 OF 2008
-----------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office
Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s
appearances, Court’s orders
order or directions
-----------------------------------------------------
¦ Mr.Vimal Gupta for the Appellant.
¦ Mr.T.D.Mistry i/b Raj Dorak for
¦ the Respondent.
¦
¦ CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH &
¦ J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
¦ DATED:17TH JULY, 2008
P.C.:
Heard the learned Counsel for the
Appellant. The delay involved is of
216 days. The court was not
satisfied with the reasons that were
given in the affidavit in support of
the Notice of Motion. Therefore, by
order dated 9-6-2008 time was given
to the Appellant to file an
affidavit giving details in relation
to the sufficient cause.
- 2 -
Though, more than a month has
elapsed, no affidavit has been
filed. In these circumstances,
therefore, in our opinion, it will
not be in the interest of justice to
condone the delay. Motion is,
therefore, disposed of.
(D.K.DESHMUKH, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.