Nma/1516/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-12, Mumbai v. M/S Sopariwala Exports
High Court
11 Jun 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1516/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-12, Mumbai v. M/S Sopariwala Exports
Date of order
11 Jun 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Nma/1516/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-12, Mumbai v. M/S Sopariwala Exports, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.1516 OF 2008in
The Commissioner of Income Tax12
.. Appellant
Mr.A.S.Rao for AppellantMr.Pankaj Toprani for Respondents
P.C.
1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Bythis notice of motion, the appellant is seekingcondonation of 296 delay caused in filing theappeal.
2. Perused the affidavit in support of the Noticeof motion. It appears that though the last datefor filing the appeal was 18.6.07 and theCommissioner of Income Tax had granted approval on14.6.07 the appeal came to be filed belatedly on9.4.08. However, almost more than 9 months wastaken for drafting the memo of appeal and further15 days to get the court fee stamps for filing theappeal. We are not at all satisfied with thereasons given for condonation of delay. Nosufficient cause is made out for condonation of
delay. Hence, Notice of motion stands dismissed.
3. In view of dismissal of the Notice of Motion,Income Tax Appeal (L) No.1071 of 2008 also standsdismissed.
{A.V.Nirgude, J)
(Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue