Nma/152/2019 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central-Ii v. Hindustan Construction Co. And Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-14 (Applicant)
High Court
14 Feb 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/152/2019 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central-Ii v. Hindustan Construction Co. And Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-14 (Applicant)
Date of order
14 Feb 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Nma/152/2019 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central-Ii v. Hindustan Construction Co. And Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-14 (Applicant), the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Priya Soparkar
179 nma 152-19 in itxa 665-09-o
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.152 OF 2009
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.665 OF 2009
Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax-14… Applicant/Appellant
V/s.
Hindustan construction Co.… Respondent
---
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Applicant/Appellant.
Mr.Sanjiv M. Shah for the Respondent.
---
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI AND
M.S.SANKLECHA, JJ.
DATE : FEBRUARY 14, 2019.
P.C.:-
1.This notice of motion is taken out by the appellant-revenue
seeking condonation of delay of 183 days in seeking restoration ofthe Income Tax Appeal which was dismissed for default.
2.For the reasons stated in the application and those made out
before us during the course from time to time, delay is condoned.Order dated 18[th] June, 2018 dismissing the appeal for non-prosecution is recalled. Appeal restored to file. Notice of motiondisposed of.
(M.S.SANKLECHA,J.) (AKIL KURESHI,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.