Case LawHigh Court › Nma/1527/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/1527/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, City-7, Mumbai v. M/S. Tata Telecom Ltd

High Court 03 Jul 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1527/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, City-7, Mumbai v. M/S. Tata Telecom Ltd
Date of order
03 Jul 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Nma/1527/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, City-7, Mumbai v. M/S. Tata Telecom Ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1527 OF 2004IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.633 OF 2004 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1527 OF 2004 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.633 OF 2004 The Commissioner of Income-tax ..Appellant. V/s. M/s.Tata Telecom Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr.Ashok Kotangale for appellant. Mr.Rajesh Shah for respondent. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDR.V.MORE, JJ. DATED : 3RD JULY, 2007. R.V.MORE, JJ. DATED : 3RD JULY, 2007. P.C. :- P.C. :- The delay is of 111 days. In our opinion, the cause shown in para 3 of the affidavit of Shri. A.K.Suri, Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax would amount to sufficient cause. Hence delay is condoned. Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Office to register the appeal. (F.I.REBELL0, J.) (F.I.REBELL0, J.) (R.V.MORE, J.) (R.V.MORE, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan