Nma/1531/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Tds, Mumbai v. M/S. Tat Tea Ltd
High Court
15 Oct 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1531/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Tds, Mumbai v. M/S. Tat Tea Ltd
Date of order
15 Oct 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Nma/1531/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Tds, Mumbai v. M/S. Tat Tea Ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Decision: In view of withdrawal of the Appeal, the notice of motion does not survive and notice of motion stands disposed of accordingly.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORIGINAL SIDE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORIGINAL SIDE
NOTICE OF MOTION No. 1531 OF 2005
NOTICE OF MOTION No. 1531 OF 2005
IN
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 499 OF 2005.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 499 OF 2005.
------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes,Office : Memoranda of Coram, : Court’s or Judge’s orders
-------------------------------------------------------------
appearances,Court ’s :
orders or directions & :
Prothonotary’s orders. :
------------------------------------------------------------
cate for the
Mr P. S. Sahadevan, Advocate for the
Appellant.
None for the Respondent.
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN
and V.C.DAGA, JJ. DATED : 15TH OCTOBER, 2008.P.C.:
and V.C.DAGA, JJ.
DATED : 15TH OCTOBER, 2008.
DATED : 15TH OCTOBER, 2008.
P.C.:
. In view of withdrawal of the Appeal,
the notice of motion does not survive and
notice of motion stands disposed of
accordingly.
(V.C. DAGA,J.) (DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(V.C. DAGA,J.) (DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue