Case Law › High Court › Nma/1537/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/1537/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S Eversmile Construction Co.p.ltd

High Court 24 Jul 2007 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

24 Jul 2007

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Nma/1537/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S Eversmile Construction Co.p.ltd, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1537 OF 2004ININCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.650 OF 2004 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1537 OF 2004 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.650 OF 2004 Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. Eversmile Const. Co. P. Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr.Ashok Kotangale i/b. Pankaj Kapoor for appellant. Mr.S.P.Mehta for respondent. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 24TH JULY, 2007. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 24TH JULY, 2007. P.C. :- P.C. :- . The delay is 450 days. In the affidavit in support which is filed, it is seen that the file was sent to the counsel for drafting the appeal on 17/2/2003. The appeal was filed on 31/5/2004. The last date of filing the appeal was 8/3/2003. There is no explanation for the delay between 17/3/2003 and 30th May, 2004. Considering the cause shown, it would not amount to sufficient cause. Hence Motion dismissed. (F.I.REBELL0, J.) (F.I.REBELL0, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.