Nma/155/2006 Of The Direction Of Income-Tax(Intrnational Taxation),Mum v. International Global Network Bv
High Court
17 Sep 2007 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/155/2006 Of The Direction Of Income-Tax(Intrnational Taxation),Mum v. International Global Network Bv
Date of order
17 Sep 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Nma/155/2006 Of The Direction Of Income-Tax(Intrnational Taxation),Mum v. International Global Network Bv, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 155 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODGING) NO. 48 OF 2006
The Director of Income Tax.... AppellantVs.International Global Network BV .... RespondentMr. B.M. Chatterji & Mrs. P.P. Bhosale forAppellant.Mr. Atul K. Jasani for Respondent.CORAM : F.I. REBELLO, &J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.DATE : 17TH SEPTEMBER, 2007P.C..The delay is less than 200 days.Considering the practical difficulties which theDepartment was facing including referring thematters to the Law Department, Government of Indiafor drafting the Appeal Memo and considering theaffidavit in support of the Notice of Motion, inour opinion, the cause shown would amount tosufficient cause. Hence, delay condoned. The
Notice of Motion is allowed in terms of prayerclause (a).
2.Office to register the Appeal.
( J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)
( J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)
( J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue