Nma/156/2018 Of The Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax-9 v. Agility Logistics Private Limited
High Court
16 Mar 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/156/2018 Of The Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax-9 v. Agility Logistics Private Limited
Date of order
16 Mar 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Nma/156/2018 Of The Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax-9 v. Agility Logistics Private Limited, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Rane* 1/3 * NMA-156-2018 (SR.10)Friday, 16.3.2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 156 OF 2018
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1057 OF 2016
The Pr. Commissioner ofIncome Tax-9
…..Applicant
(Orig. Appellant)
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN :
The Pr. Commissioner ofIncome Tax-9 ….AppellantV/s.Agility Logistics PrivateLimited….Respondent
* * * * *
Mr. Arvind Pinto, Advocate for the applicant-original appellant.
Mr. Atul Jasani, Advocate for the respondent.
CORAM :- M.S. SANKLECHA, &SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.DATE :-16TH MARCH, 2018.
P.C. :-
1.
This Notice of Motion seeks to set aside the
Rane
* 2/3 * NMA-156-2018 (SR.10)Friday, 16.3.2018
order dated 3rd September, 2015 passed by the Prothonotary & Senior Master rejecting the petitioner's
Appeal by a self-operating order for failure to remove office objections on/or before 1st October, 2015. This rejection of the Appeal was in terms of Rule 986 of the Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules. For the aforesaid purpose, the application also seeks condonation of dealy of 419 days delay in taking out this Notice of Motion.
2.This application, as filed, is misconceived. The appellant-Revenue had already taken out an application being Notice of Motion No. 1362 of 2016 seeking to set aside the order dated 3rd September, 2015 passed by the Prothonotary & Senior Master rejecting the petitioner's Appeal. The above Notice of Motion No. 1362 of 2016 was allowed by an order dated 17th June, 2017 and time was granted to the appellant to remove office objections within a period of 2 weeks failing which the Appeal stood dismissed.
Rane
Friday, 16.3.2018
3.
Consequently, this application is not
maintainable in law. Thus, the Notice of Motion is
dismissed. No order as to costs.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.