Nma/158/2018 Of Devdatta Chandrakant Patil v. Income Tax Officer And 2 Ors
High Court
16 Mar 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/158/2018 Of Devdatta Chandrakant Patil v. Income Tax Officer And 2 Ors
Date of order
16 Mar 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Nma/158/2018 Of Devdatta Chandrakant Patil v. Income Tax Officer And 2 Ors, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The applicant is directed to remove office objections within a period of 4 weeks from today failing which the Appeal would stand dismissed without further reference to the Court.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
* 1/2 * NMA—158-2018 (SR. 11)Friday, 16.3.2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 158 OF 2018
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO. 87 OF 2018
Devdatta Chandrakant Patil
….Applicant(Orig. Appellant)
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN :
Devdatta Chandrakant Patil ….Appellant
V/s.Income-Tax Officer and 2 Ors.….Respondents
* * * * *
Mr. Jitendra Patil, Advocate for the applicant-original appellant.
CORAM :- M.S. SANKLECHA, &
SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.
DATE :-16TH MARCH, 2018.
P.C. :-
1.This application seeks condonation of 81 days delay in filing the accompanying Appeal from the order
Rane
dated 17th May, 2017 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (“the Tribunal).
2.We have perused the Affidavit dated 22nd
January, 2018 of the applicant in support of the Motion. We are satisfied with the reasons indicated therein for the
delay in filing the accompanying Appeal. Accordingly, the Notice of Motion is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
3. The applicant is directed to remove office objections within a period of 4 weeks from today failing which the Appeal would stand dismissed without further reference to the Court.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue