Case LawHigh Court › Nma/1587/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/1587/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-Ii, Mumbai v. M/S Walchand Hindustan Ltd

High Court 02 Jun 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1587/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-Ii, Mumbai v. M/S Walchand Hindustan Ltd
Date of order
02 Jun 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Nma/1587/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-Ii, Mumbai v. M/S Walchand Hindustan Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In view of the dismissal of the Notice of Motion,appeal stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1587 of 2008InINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.of 2008The Commissioner of Income Tax(Central)-II, Mumbai... AppellantV/sM/s Walchand Hindustan Ltd. ..RespondentsMr. B.M.Chatterji with Mr.P.S.Sahaderan for AppellantMr.B.A.D’Lima for the RespondentCORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNANAND A.P.BHANGALE,JJDATED: JUNE 2, 2008P.C.:-1. Heard the learned Advocates for the Appellant andRespondent.2. By the present Notice of Motion the appellant isseeking condonation of delay of 222 days caused infiling the appeal. The tax effect in the above appealis valued at Rs.3.62 lacs. The learned Advocate forthe appellant states that as it is a recurring issue,he is not withdrawing the appeal. Almost 6 months weretaken for drafting the memo of appeal and another two months to obtain Court fee stamps. 3. We perused the affidavit in support of the Noticeof Motion. Only reason given for condonation of delayis that no prejudice will be caused to the Respondentif the appeal is restored to the file and decided onits merit by this Court. However, the above reasongiven is absolutely unsustainable as the appeal has notbeen dismissed earlier. There is no sufficient cause shown for condoning the aforesaid delay. Hence Noticeof Motion stands dismissed. 4. In view of the dismissal of the Notice of Motion,appeal stands dismissed. (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J) (A.P.BHANGALE,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan