Case Law › High Court › Nma/1590/2009 Of The Commisioner Of Inco...

Nma/1590/2009 Of The Commisioner Of Income Tax- 2 Mumbai v. M/S. Gilt Securities Trading Corporation Ltd

High Court 04 Dec 2015 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

04 Dec 2015

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In Nma/1590/2009 Of The Commisioner Of Income Tax- 2 Mumbai v. M/S. Gilt Securities Trading Corporation Ltd, the High Court (2015) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1590 OF 2009 ININTEREST TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 8 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax-2 .. Appellant v/s. M/s. Gilt Securities Trading Corporation Ltd. ..Respondent Mr. Ashok Kotangale for the appellant Mr. Subhash Shetty for the respondent CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & G.S. KULKARNI, J.J. DATED : 4[th] DECEMBER, 2015. P.C. 1.Mr. Kotangale, learned Counsel appearing for the Revenue undertakes to file his Vakalatnama by 9[th] December, 2015. 2.This motion seeks condonation of 142 days delay in filing the accompanying appeal. We are satisfied with the reasons set out in the affidavit-in-support explaining the reasons for the delay. 3.Accordingly, the Notice of Motion is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). (G.S. KULKARNI, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.