Case LawHigh Court › Nma/1592/2003 Of Comm. Of Income Tax, Ce...

Nma/1592/2003 Of Comm. Of Income Tax, Central-I Mum v. Tridoss Laboratories Ltd

High Court 26 Feb 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1592/2003 Of Comm. Of Income Tax, Central-I Mum v. Tridoss Laboratories Ltd
Date of order
26 Feb 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Nma/1592/2003 Of Comm. Of Income Tax, Central-I Mum v. Tridoss Laboratories Ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1592 OF 2003 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.499 OF 2003 The Commissioner of Income-tax Central-I, Mumbai .. Appellant. V/s. M/s.Tridoss Lab. Limited .. Respondent. Mr.B.M. Chatterjee with Mrs.P.P. Bhosale for the Appellant. None for the respondent. CORAM : DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 26TH FEBRUARY, 2007. P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the respondent. 2. By this notice of motion, the appellant is seeking condonation of 55 days delay in filing the appeal. 3. For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of notice of motion, sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. There is no case of any inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the appellant. 4. The notice of motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) 2 (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan