Case LawHigh Court › Nma/1592/2009 Of The Commisioner Of Inco...

Nma/1592/2009 Of The Commisioner Of Income Tax- 2 Mumbai v. Bank Of Credit And Commerce Inter National Ltd

High Court 12 Jun 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1592/2009 Of The Commisioner Of Income Tax- 2 Mumbai v. Bank Of Credit And Commerce Inter National Ltd
Date of order
12 Jun 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Nma/1592/2009 Of The Commisioner Of Income Tax- 2 Mumbai v. Bank Of Credit And Commerce Inter National Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 2.As the motion is dismissed, the appeal also stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1592 OF 2009WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.4058 OF 2008 Commissioner of Income Tax..Appellant. V/s. Bank of Credit & Commerce International (Overseas) Ltd...Respondent. Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant.None for respondent. CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 12TH JUNE, 2009. P.C. :- 1.Heard learned counsel for the appellant. Notice of Motion seeks condonation of about 2021 days delay in filing the above appeal. We are taken through the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion. We do not find any reson to condone the delay since no sufficient cause is made out explaining the delay caused in filing the above appeal. The Notice of Motion is, therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs. 2.As the motion is dismissed, the appeal also stands dismissed. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan