In Nma/1603/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 6 Mumbai v. Atco Industries Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2.As the motion is dismissed, the appeal also stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.1603 OF 2009ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.4156 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s. Atco Industries Ltd.
..Respondent.
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant. None for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 12TH JUNE, 2009.
P.C. :-
1.Heard learned counsel for the appellant. Notice of Motion seeks condonation of about 12 days delay in filing the above appeal. We are taken through the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion. We do not find any reson to condone the delay since no sufficient cause is made out explaining the delay caused in filing the above appeal. The Notice of Motion is, therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs.
2.As the motion is dismissed, the appeal also
stands dismissed.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue