Nma/162/2018 Of Jayantilal Investments v. The Income Tax Officer-25(3)(2) C-11 And 3 Ors
High Court
27 Apr 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/162/2018 Of Jayantilal Investments v. The Income Tax Officer-25(3)(2) C-11 And 3 Ors
Date of order
27 Apr 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Nma/162/2018 Of Jayantilal Investments v. The Income Tax Officer-25(3)(2) C-11 And 3 Ors, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 162 OF 2018
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1639 OF 2017
M/s. Jayantilal Investments
.. Applicant
In the matter betweenM/s. Jayantilal Investments
.. Appellant
v/s. The Income Tax Officer-25(3)(2)and Ors. .. Respondents
Mr. Y.R. Shah for the applicant / orig. appellant Mr. Arvind Pinto for the respondent
P.C.
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA &
SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.J.
DATED : 27[th] APRIL, 2018.
1.Mr. Shah, learned Counsel appearing in support of the motion, on instructions, seeks to withdraw the motion to pursue remedies available under the Income Tax Act, 1961. Liberty granted.
2.The Notice of Motion is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue