Case Law › High Court › Nma/1623/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/1623/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. Royal Business Centre P.ltd

High Court 19 Mar 2008 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

19 Mar 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Nma/1623/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. Royal Business Centre P.ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1623 OF 2006 INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) NO.832 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income- ... ... AppellantTax, Mumbai M/s Royal Business Centre... ... RespondentPvt.Ltd. Mr. A.S. Rao and Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for Appellant.Mr. Vishnu S. Hedade for Respondent .We have heard the learned counsel for theparties. There is a delay of 31 days.Considering the cause shown, delay condonedsubject to appellant’s paying to the respondentcosts quantified at Rs.2,500/- as conditionprecedent within 12 weeks from today and removingoffice objections within twelve weeks. Office toregister the Appeal.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.