Case LawHigh Court › Nma/164/2018 Of Aarti Industries Limited...

Nma/164/2018 Of Aarti Industries Limited v. Commissioner Of Income Tax-15(1)Mumbai And Anr

High Court 16 Mar 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/164/2018 Of Aarti Industries Limited v. Commissioner Of Income Tax-15(1)Mumbai And Anr
Date of order
16 Mar 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Nma/164/2018 Of Aarti Industries Limited v. Commissioner Of Income Tax-15(1)Mumbai And Anr, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appellant is directed to remove office objections, if any, within a period of 4 weeks from today failing which the Appeal would stand dismissed without further reference to the Court.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

* 1/3 * NMA—164-2018 (SR. 15)Friday, 16.3.2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 164 OF 2018 ININCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO. 3175 OF 2017 Aarti Industries Limited ….Applicant (Orig. Appellant) -IN THE MATTER BETWEEN : Aarti Industries LimitedV/s.Commissioner of Income-Tax-15(1), Mumbai and anr. ….Appellant ….Respondents * * * * * Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, a/w. Mr. Ravindra Poojary, Advocate for the applicant-original appellant. CORAM :- M.S. SANKLECHA, & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ. DATE :-16TH MARCH, 2018. P.C. :- 1. None appears for the respondent despite Rane 2.This application seeks condonation of 161 days delay in filing the accompanying Appeal from the order dated 9th March, 2017 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (“the Tribunal). 3.We have perused the Affidavit dated 21st December, 2017 of the applicant in support of the Motion. We note that the delay in filing the accompanying Appeal arose on account of the fact that the applicant had moved a Miscellaneous Application before the Tribunal on 12th April, 2017 (within one month of the receipt of the order dated 9th March, 2017 of the Tribunal). This Miscellaneous Application was dismissed on 6th September, 2017 and the same was received by the appellant on 21st September, 2017. Thereafter, the present Appeal has been filed on 22nd December, 2017. 4.We find that the appellant has sufficiently explained the reasons for the delay as it was prosecuting the remedy of the Miscellaneous Application for rectification before the Tribunal. Rane 5.In the above view, the Notice of Motion is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). 6. The appellant is directed to remove office objections, if any, within a period of 4 weeks from today failing which the Appeal would stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. (SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan