In Nma/1648/2017 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. Trans Impex Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
SKN
1/1 1648.17-nma
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1648 OF 2017
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LDG.) NO. 847 OF 2017
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2.…Applicant.V/s.Trans Impex Pvt.Ltd.…Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the applicant.Mr.Sameer Dalal i/b. Mint & Confreres for the respondent.
CORAM :A.S.OKA AND A.K.MENON, JJ.DATE :13[th] November 2017.
P.C.:
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the applicant and the learned counsel appearing of the respondent. In view of the averments made in the affidavit-in-support, sufficient cause is made out to condone delay of 44 days. Accordingly, notice of motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
(A.K.MENON, J.)
(A.S.OKA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue