Case LawHigh Court › Nma/165/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Nma/165/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Mumbai v. M/S. Borax Morarji Ltd

High Court 05 Feb 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/165/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Mumbai v. M/S. Borax Morarji Ltd
Date of order
05 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Nma/165/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Mumbai v. M/S. Borax Morarji Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: As the Notice of Motion for condonation of delay is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.165 OF 2007 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2597 OF 2006 The C.I.T.-2 ..Appellant V/s. M/s.Borax Morarji Ltd., ..Respondent ---- Mrs.P.P.Bhosale with Mr.B.M.Chatterji for the appellant. Mr.V.S.Hadade for the respondent. ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 5.2.2008. PC 1. This is a Notice of Motion for condoning 331 days delay in filing of the main appeal. A perusal of the affidavit-in-support indicates that the CCIT-2 recommended the filing of the appeal on 5.12.2005. Appeal was filed more than one year later on 7.12.2006. Between the aforesaid two dates, no dates have been given in respect of the events that occurred. In our view, therefore, the cause shown does not amount to sufficient cause. Hence, Notice of Motion stands dismissed. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2597 OF 2007 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2597 OF 2007 1. As the Notice of Motion for condonation of delay is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,j)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan