Nma/165/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Mumbai v. M/S. Borax Morarji Ltd
High Court
05 Feb 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/165/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Mumbai v. M/S. Borax Morarji Ltd
Date of order
05 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Nma/165/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Mumbai v. M/S. Borax Morarji Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: As the Notice of Motion for condonation of delay is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.165 OF 2007
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2597 OF 2006
The C.I.T.-2 ..Appellant
V/s.
M/s.Borax Morarji Ltd., ..Respondent
----
Mrs.P.P.Bhosale with Mr.B.M.Chatterji for the
appellant.
Mr.V.S.Hadade for the respondent.
----
Coram : F.I.Rebello &
R.S.Mohite,JJ
Date : 5.2.2008.
PC
1. This is a Notice of Motion for condoning 331
days delay in filing of the main appeal. A perusal
of the affidavit-in-support indicates that the
CCIT-2 recommended the filing of the appeal on
5.12.2005. Appeal was filed more than one year
later on 7.12.2006. Between the aforesaid two
dates, no dates have been given in respect of the
events that occurred. In our view, therefore, the
cause shown does not amount to sufficient cause.
Hence, Notice of Motion stands dismissed.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2597 OF 2007
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2597 OF 2007
1. As the Notice of Motion for condonation of delay
is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,j)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.