Nma/1654/2017 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax 2 v. Hdfc Bank Ltd
High Court
13 Nov 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1654/2017 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax 2 v. Hdfc Bank Ltd
Date of order
13 Nov 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/1654/2017 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax 2 v. Hdfc Bank Ltd, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
SKN
1/1 1654.17-nma
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1654 OF 2017
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LDG.) NO. 843 OF 2017
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2.…Applicant.V/s.HDFC Bank Ltd.…Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the applicant.
Mr.J.B.Mistry, Senior Advocate with Mr.A.K.Jasani for the respondent.
CORAM :A.S.OKA AND A.K.MENON, JJ.DATE :13[th] November 2017.
P.C.:
Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant states that the Prothonotary and Senior Master has extended time granted to the applicant to remove office objections.
2.In view of the averments made in the affidavit-in-support, sufficient cause is made out to condone delay of 44 days. Accordingly, notice of motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
(A.K.MENON, J.)(A.S.OKA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue