Case LawHigh Court › Nma/1657/2013 Of Rameshwar E. Kalantri v...

Nma/1657/2013 Of Rameshwar E. Kalantri v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle -3

High Court 13 Nov 2014 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1657/2013 Of Rameshwar E. Kalantri v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle -3
Date of order
13 Nov 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Nma/1657/2013 Of Rameshwar E. Kalantri v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle -3, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

sbw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1657 OF 2013 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.5350 OF 2010 Rameshwar E. Kalantri..ApplicantIn the matter betweenRameshwar E. Kalantri..Appellant-Versus- Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Circle-3..Respondent WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1658 OF 2013 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.5408 OF 2010 WITHIN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1659 OF 2013 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.5015 OF 2010 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1660 OF 2013IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.5013 OF 2010 ........... Mr. Mihir Naniwadekar for the Applicant. ........... CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI AND A. A. SAYED, JJ. DATE :- 13[th] NOVEMBER, 2014 P.C.: Heard Mr. Naniwadekar, learned counsel for the Applicant. We see no reason to grant any of the prayers of these Notice of Motions. The Notice of Motions are, therefore, dismissed. No costs. (A. A. SAYED, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.) wadhwa
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan