Nma/1658/2006 Of Th Com,Missioner Of Income-Tax-3,Mum v. M/S Dadhichi Taxfab Pvt Ltd
High Court
22 Oct 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1658/2006 Of Th Com,Missioner Of Income-Tax-3,Mum v. M/S Dadhichi Taxfab Pvt Ltd
Date of order
22 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Nma/1658/2006 Of Th Com,Missioner Of Income-Tax-3,Mum v. M/S Dadhichi Taxfab Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.1658 OF 2006IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.673 OF 2006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1658 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.673 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Dadhichi Texfab Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.A.S.Rao with P.S.Sahadevan for appellant.
Mr.J.D.Mistry with Raj Darak for respondent.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 22ND OCTOBER, 2007.
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 22ND OCTOBER, 2007.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
There is a delay of 696 days in preferring
the appeal. There is affidavit of Mr.P.P.
Kishinchandani in support of the Motion. The order of
the I.T.A.T. dated 29/9/2003 was received by the
CIT-III, Mumbai on 23/1/2004. The Chief CIT granted
approval on 25/3/2004. The file was sent to the
Ministry of Law on 25/3/2004. The draft appeal memo
was received on 17/5/2005. There is no explanation
whatsoever for the delay between 25/3/2004 and
17/5/2005. Considering the cause shown, in our
opinion, the same would not amount to sufficient cause.
Hence Motion is dismissed.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELL0, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.