Nma/1660/2004 Of Dorothea Leo v. The Asstt. Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Mum. And Anr
High Court
10 Sep 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1660/2004 Of Dorothea Leo v. The Asstt. Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Mum. And Anr
Date of order
10 Sep 2004
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/1660/2004 Of Dorothea Leo v. The Asstt. Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Mum. And Anr, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORIGINAL SIDENOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1660 OF 2004ININCOME TAX APPEAL (LODGING) NO. 198 OF 2004Dorothea Leo, Mumbai.Appellantvs.The Asstt. Commissioner of Income-tax,12(2) Mumbai.RespondentMr.V.S. Handade for the appellant.CORAM:R. M. LODHA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJDATED:10th September 2004P.C.Heard the learned counsel for the appellant.Nobody appears for the revenue-respondent despiteservice. There is delay of one day in filing theappeal. For the reasons stated in the affidavit insupport of notice of motion, we are satisfied that theappellant was prevented by sufficient cause in filingthe appeal in time.
2. Delay in filing the appeal is condoned.
3. Office is directed to process the appeal and post it
for admission as soon as the same is numbered.
4. Notice of motion stands disposed of.
(R.M. LODHA, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue