In Nma/1664/2008 Of Athe Commissioner Of Income-Tax(Central)-Ii v. Subhash Ghai, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1664 of 2008InINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.of 2008The Commissioner of Income tax(Central II) Mumbai .. AppellantV/sSubsh Ghai..RespondentsMr. B.M. Chaterji with P.S.Sahadevan for AppellantMr.ajay R.Singh for the RespondentCORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNANAND A.P.BHANGALE,JJDATED: JUNE 2, 2008P.C.:-
1. Heard the learned Advocates for the Appellant andRespondent.
2. The appellant is seeking condonation of delay of 2days caused in filing the appeal. Perused theaffidavit in support of the Notice of Motion.Sufficient cause is being made out for condoning the
delay. Hence Notice of Motion is made absolute in
terms of prayer clause (a).
3. Place the appeal on board for admission in the
month of July 2008.
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J)
(A.P.BHANGALE,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue