In Nma/1667/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City-20, Mumbai v. Mrs. Sheila Anil Paul, Mumbai, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.1667 OF 2009 ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.843 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax
..Appellant.
V/s.
Mrs.Sheila Anil Paul ..Respondent.
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant.
None for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 30TH JUNE. 2009.
P.C. :-
1.In spite of service, nobody is present on behalf of the respondent. Heard learned counsel for the appellant. For the reasons stated in the affidavit, Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Appeal be numbered.
2.Notice of Motion is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue