Nma/1670/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -16, Mumbai v. M/S Metro Motors Auto Division , Mumbai
High Court
13 Nov 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1670/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -16, Mumbai v. M/S Metro Motors Auto Division , Mumbai
Date of order
13 Nov 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/1670/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -16, Mumbai v. M/S Metro Motors Auto Division , Mumbai, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
sbw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1670 OF 2012
IN
REVIEW PETITION (L)NO.92 OF 2011
IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2073 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax-16
..Review Petitioner (Orig. Appellant)
-Versus-M/s. Metro Motors Auto Division
..Review Respondent (Orig. Respondent)
...........
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Petitioner.None for the Respondents.
...........
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
AND A. A. SAYED, JJ.
DATE :- 13[th] NOVEMBER, 2014
P.C.:
Having heard Mr. Suresh Kumar, learned counsel, appearing in support of this Motion and finding that there is a sufficient cause for the delay in filing the Review Petition, this Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). The Assessee and the Advocate, both are absent though duly served. The cause for the delay is both reasonable and bona fide. In these circumstances, Notice of Motion is made absolute.
The Registry to place that Review Petition as per its turn.
(A. A. SAYED, J.)
(S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
wadhwa
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue