In Nma/1688/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-Ii v. M/S. Manubhai Sons And Co, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: As the Motion for condoning delay is dismissed, Appeal also stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1688 OF 2005
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.734 OF 2005
The CIT Central-II ..Appellant
V/s.
Manubhai Sons & Co. ..Respondents
----
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant.
Mr.A.K.Jasani for the respondents.
----
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Date : 25.03.2008.
PC
1. This is a Motion for condoning 804 days delay in
filing of the appeal. A perusal of the affidavit in
support indicates that the file was sent to the
Ministry of Law for drafting an appeal memo on
14.2.2003 but the draft appeal memo was received
from Ministry of Law on 19.5.2004. A period of 1
year and 2 months for drafting appeal memo cannot be
said to be reasonable. In our view, the cause shown
does not amount to sufficient cause and thus Motion
stands dismissed.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.734 OF 2005
. As the Motion for condoning delay is dismissed,
Appeal also stands dismissed.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue