Nma/1696/2003 Of Comm. Of Income-Tax, City-Iii, Mum v. Industrial Credit And Investment
High Court
12 Feb 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1696/2003 Of Comm. Of Income-Tax, City-Iii, Mum v. Industrial Credit And Investment
Date of order
12 Feb 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/1696/2003 Of Comm. Of Income-Tax, City-Iii, Mum v. Industrial Credit And Investment, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1696 OF 2003
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.572 OF 2003
CIT, Bombay .. Appellant.
V/s.
ICICI Bank Ltd. .. Respondent.
Mr.A.M. Kotangale for the appellant.
Mr.S.J. Mehta for the respondent.
CORAM : DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 12TH FEBRUARY, 2007.
P.C. :
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and
the learned counsel for the respondent.
2. By this notice of motion, the appellant is
seeking condonation of 224 days delay in filing the
above appeal.
3. For the reasons stated in the affidavit in
support of notice of motion, sufficient cause is
made out for condonation of delay. There is no case
of any inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on
the part of the appellant.
4. The notice of motion is made absolute in
terms of prayer clause (a).
(DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
2
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue