Case LawHigh Court › Nma/1699/2003 Of Comm. Of Income Tax, Ci...

Nma/1699/2003 Of Comm. Of Income Tax, City-Iii, Mum v. Industrial Credit And Investment Corpn

High Court 06 Mar 2007 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1699/2003 Of Comm. Of Income Tax, City-Iii, Mum v. Industrial Credit And Investment Corpn
Date of order
06 Mar 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Nma/1699/2003 Of Comm. Of Income Tax, City-Iii, Mum v. Industrial Credit And Investment Corpn, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: In view of disposal of the appeal, the Notice of Motion also stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1699 OF 2003 ININCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.573 OF 2003 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1699 OF 2003 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.573 OF 2003 The Commissioner of Income-tax ..Appellant. V/s. ICICI Bank Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr.A.N.Kotangale with P.S. Sahderan for appellant. Mr.S.P.Mehta for respondent. CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 6TH MARCH, 2007. P.C. :- P.C. :- The learned counsel for the appellant seeks to withdraw the appeal in view of the Judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Sandvik Asia Ltd. V/s.Commissioner of Income-tax and Ors. reported in (2006)280 I.T.R. 643 (S.C.). The appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such. 2. Court fees be refunded as per rules. 3. In view of disposal of the appeal, the Notice of Motion also stands dismissed. (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan