Nma/1699/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S Daswani And Co
High Court
09 Jul 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1699/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S Daswani And Co
Date of order
09 Jul 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Nma/1699/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S Daswani And Co, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1699 OF 2004
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.744 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Income Tax .. Applicant.
V/s.
M/s.Deswani & Co. .. Respondent.
Mr.A.S. Rao i/by Mr.Pankaj Kapoor for the applicant.
Ms.Beena Pillai i/by D.M. Harish & Co. for the
respondent.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 9TH JULY, 2007.
P.C. :
1. From the additional affidavit filed by Shri
Arvind R. Deshpande which has been described as
better affidavit in which various dates whereby steps
were taken for the purposes of filing Appeal has been
set out. It is pointed out that the Chief
Commissioner of Income Tax-7, Bombay approved filing
of Appeal on 14th October, 2002 and the file was sent
to the Ministry of Law. The draft Appeal was
received on 18th March, 2004. In other words, there
is no explanation as to why it took more than one
year and five months for drafting the Appeal Memo.
2. In our opinion, the cause shown, therefore,
would not amount to sufficient cause. Hence, the
notice of motion is dismissed.
2
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.