Nma/1699/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 10, Mumbai v. Colgate Palmolive (I) Ltd
High Court
28 Mar 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1699/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 10, Mumbai v. Colgate Palmolive (I) Ltd
Date of order
28 Mar 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/1699/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 10, Mumbai v. Colgate Palmolive (I) Ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ASN
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1699 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.1550 OF 2005
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Office notes, office Memorandaof Coram, appearance, Court’sorders or directions andRegistrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr.V.G.Gupta with P.S.Sahadevan for theAppellant.
Mr. Nishit Doshi i/by Crawford Bayley & Co.for the Respondent.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED : 28th March,2008.
P.C.
the aforesaid period, delay condoned. Office
to register the appeal.
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)
(F.I. REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue