Case LawHigh Court › Nma/1704/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/1704/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-3 v. M/S Ambit Estate And Development Co. Pvt. Ltd

High Court 16 Oct 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1704/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-3 v. M/S Ambit Estate And Development Co. Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
16 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Nma/1704/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-3 v. M/S Ambit Estate And Development Co. Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1704 OF 2006IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.856 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1704 OF 2006 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.856 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. M/s.Ambit Estate & Development Co. Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr.Vimal Gupta with P.S.Sahadevan for appellant. Mr.K.Gopal with Jitendra Singh for respondent. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 16TH OCTOBER, 2007. P.C. :- P.C. :- There is a delay of 384 days in preferring the appeal. There is affidavit in support of Mr.V. Murlidharan. The I.T.A.T. order was received 20/12/2004. The file was forwarded to the Ministry of Law on 19/4/2005. The draft appeal memo was received on 24/11/2005 and the appeal was filed on 11/5/2006. There is no explanation whatsoever for the delay between 19/4/2005 and 24/11/2005 amd thereafter from 24/11/2005 to 11/5/2006. In our opinion, the cause shown would not amount to sufficient cause. Hence Motion is dismissed. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELL0, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan