Nma/1704/2016 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-17 v. M/S. Bhumiraj Construction
High Court
17 Jun 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1704/2016 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-17 v. M/S. Bhumiraj Construction
Date of order
17 Jun 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Nma/1704/2016 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-17 v. M/S. Bhumiraj Construction, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOICE OF MOTION(L) NO.1171 OF 2016ININCOME TAX APPEAL(L) NO.2 OF 2016
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-17In the matter betweenPr. Commissioner of Income Tax-17VersusM/s. Bhumiraj Construction
..Applicant
..Appellant
..Respondent
...........
Mr. Shyam Walve for the Applicant.
...........
CORAM: M. S. SANKLECHA & A. K. MENON, JJ.
P.C.:
DATE : 17TH JUNE, 2016
1.Mr. Walve, the learned counsel in support of the application states that the respondent has been served. Mr.Walve undertakes to file an affidavit of service within a period of one week from today. This Notice of Motion seeks condonation of 226 days delay in filing the accompanying
appeal from the order of the Tribunal dated 11[th] December, 2014.
2.We have perused the affidavit in support and are satisfied with the reasons set out therein. Accordingly, we condone the delay in filing the appeal.
2
3.Notice of Motion is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
(A. K. MENON, J.)
(M. S. SANKLECHA, J.)
wadhwa
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue