Nma/1706/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-19 v. Hotel Apsara International
High Court
16 Oct 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1706/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-19 v. Hotel Apsara International
Date of order
16 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Nma/1706/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-19 v. Hotel Apsara International, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1706 OF 2006IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.888 OF 2006
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1706 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.888 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
Hotel Apsara International ..Respondent.
Mr.R.G.Bhat for appellant.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 16TH OCTOBER, 2007.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
There is a delay of 401 days in preferring
the appeal. There is affidavit in support filed by
Smt.N.V.Nadkarni The I.T.A.T. order dated 4/10/2004
was sent to the assessing officer only on 7/1/2005.
The file was forwarded to the Ministry of Law on
25/2/2005. The draft appeal memo was received on
28/2/2006 and the appeal was filed on 17/5/2006. There
is no explanation whatsoever for the delay between
25/2/2005 and 28/2/2006. In our opinion, the cause
shown would not amount to sufficient cause. Hence
Motion is dismissed.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELL0, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.