Case LawHigh Court › Nma/1706/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/1706/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-19 v. Hotel Apsara International

High Court 16 Oct 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1706/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-19 v. Hotel Apsara International
Date of order
16 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Nma/1706/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-19 v. Hotel Apsara International, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1706 OF 2006IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.888 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1706 OF 2006 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.888 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. Hotel Apsara International ..Respondent. Mr.R.G.Bhat for appellant. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 16TH OCTOBER, 2007. P.C. :- P.C. :- There is a delay of 401 days in preferring the appeal. There is affidavit in support filed by Smt.N.V.Nadkarni The I.T.A.T. order dated 4/10/2004 was sent to the assessing officer only on 7/1/2005. The file was forwarded to the Ministry of Law on 25/2/2005. The draft appeal memo was received on 28/2/2006 and the appeal was filed on 17/5/2006. There is no explanation whatsoever for the delay between 25/2/2005 and 28/2/2006. In our opinion, the cause shown would not amount to sufficient cause. Hence Motion is dismissed. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELL0, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan