Nma/1728/2008 Of Director Of Income-Tax(International Taxation v. Century Textiles And Industries Lstd
High Court
09 Jun 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/1728/2008 Of Director Of Income-Tax(International Taxation v. Century Textiles And Industries Lstd
Date of order
09 Jun 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Nma/1728/2008 Of Director Of Income-Tax(International Taxation v. Century Textiles And Industries Lstd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1728 OF 2008
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1728 OF 2008
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L.) NO.146 OF 2008
Director of Income Tax,.[International Taxation], Mumbai...AppellantV/s.Century Textiles & Industries Ltd....Respondent
Mr.Parag A. Vyas, Advocate, for the Appellant.Mr.B. Damodar, Advocate, i/b. Kanga & Co., for theRespondent.
P.C. :
CORAM : DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN &A.V. NIRGUDE, JJ.DATE : 9TH JUNE, 2008.
.Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellantand for the Respondent.
2.By this Notice of Motion, the Appellant isseeking condonation of delay of 193 days in filing theAppeal. Perused the Notice of Motion and theaffidavit-in-support thereof. For the reasons statedtherein, sufficient cause is made out. There is nocase of inaction, negligence or want of bonafides onthe part of the appellant. Hence, the Notice of Motionis made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
: 2 :
[DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.]
[DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.]
[A.V. NIRGUDE, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue